Follow Club Spurs on Twitter
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Strong comeback my ass. This dude would rather have J.O. over Dirk.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>
The numbers don't lie, O'Neal is a better fit on the Mavs then Nowititzki<br>
<br>
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br>
The Waltons, The O'Neals, the Nowitz<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>
<br>
huh?[/quote]<br>
What?<br>
<br>
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br>
Seven foot small forward = Keith Van<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>
<br>
<br>
Dirk ain't KVH no matter what position he plays.[/quote]<br>
<br>
You're right, Van Horne had a better shooting percentage then Nowititzki 48.2% to 46.3% because Van Horne only attempted 176 three pointers versus Dirks 390.<br>
<br>
The 390 three point attempts shows up in offensive rebounds also. Even though Dirk averaged more then seven more minutes a game, Van Horne averaged twice as many boards off the glass then Dirk (2.1 to 1.0).<br>
<br>
Here is another interesting fact, Dirk attempted more three pointers (390) then the entire starting back court of the sixers, Iverson and Snow (335).<br>
<br>
<br>
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I ain't got no Pals at DB.com.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>
I'm shocked, I think you represent their base of posters very well. I've always thought people who try to make their subjective opinion an objective truth were quite popular. <br>
<br>
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>MAGIC JOHNSON WAS SIMPLY THE BEST EXAMPLE I COULD THINK OF AT THE TIME.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>
And it's a bad example, at least in regards to supporting your argument. Do you have any better ones?<br>
<br>
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> You are nuts for thinking Jermaine O'Neal is better than Dirk Nowitzki. Let's call a truce. I won't attack you, you don't attack me, deal?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>
<br>
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Nuts<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>
General McAuliffe's reply to the Nazi demand to surrender during the Battle of the Bulge. (let's try to avoid making any bulge jokes OK?)<br>
<br>
You call me nuts and ask for a truce in the same post? Your wit is only rivaled by your tactfulness. How about this, you do what you want to do, and I'll do what I want to do. Feel free to interpret my posts as an attack if you wish, however I think the spirit of my post was funny. <br>
<br>
Or to return to the spirit of the post. To speel it out for you. F U N N Y.<br>
<br>
Heck did I even deny that I don't need a clue?<br>
<br>
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>All you other people are crazy to defend sysphos on this one, when I am so clearly right. Have a nice day!<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>
<br>
I hope you are not basing your opinion on the opinion of others. Step up and be your own person. Who cares what anyone else thinks? You are wrong if you think that your opinion is invalidated if everyone disagrees with it.<br>
<br>
I'm not changing my opinion until a better alternative is presented. To date, all you've presented are questions about my mental capacity and bad examples more then anything of substance. <br>
<br>
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>my ass<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>
Let's please leave any references to your ass out of any future posts. *shudder*
<p></p><i></i>
